Dealing with North Korea.

Rover

Moderator
Joined
Oct 23, 2008
Posts
3,826
Reaction score
5,918
Worth a thought,


A former US Navy SEAL tweeted his solution to the North Korean crisis - and it just might work

How would former US Navy SEAL Jocko Willink handle North Korea? 'Drop 25 million iPhones on them and put satellites over them with free wi-fi'

  • Alex Lockie Business Insider
  • Tuesday 12 September 2017 14:07 BST
When Jocko Willink‏, a former US Navy SEAL who is now an author and occasional Business Insider contributor, was asked on Twitter how he would handle the North Korean crisis, he gave an unexpected answer that one expert said just might work.

Willink's proposal didn't involve any covert special operation strikes or military moves of any kind. Instead of bombs, Willink suggested the US drop iPhones.

“Drop 25 million iPhones on them and put satellites over them with free wifi,” Willink tweeted last week.

While the proposal itself is fantastical and far-fetched, Yun Sun, an expert on North Korea at the Stimson Center, says the core concept could work.

“Kim Jong-un understands that as soon as society is open and North Korean people realise what they're missing, Kim's regime is unsustainable, and it's going to be overthrown,” Sun told Business Insider.

For this reason, North Korea's government would strongly oppose any measures that mirror Willink's suggestion.

Sun pointed out that when South Korea had previously flown balloons that dropped pamphlets and DVDs over North Korea, the Kim regime had responded militarily, sensing the frailty of its government relative to those of prosperous liberal democracies.

For this reason, North Korea would turn down even free iPhones for its entire population, thought to be about 25.2 million.


Kim Jong-un attending an art performance dedicated to nuclear scientists and technicians, who worked on a hydrogen bomb which the regime claimed to have successfully tested (Getty)

Such a measure, Sun said, would also open the West to criticism “for rewarding a illegitimately nuclear dictatorship” that “we know has committed massive human rights against its people.”

North Korean leader Kim Jong-un at a celebration for nuclear scientists and engineers who contributed to a hydrogen bomb test, in an undated photo released by North Korea's Korean Central News Agency.

And as North Korea puts the Kim regime above all else, any investment or aid would “be exploited first and foremost by the government,” Sun said, adding: “We will have to swallow the consequence that of $100 investment, maybe $10 would reach the people.”

North Korea harshly punishes ordinary citizens who are found to enjoy South Korean media, so there's good reason to think providing internet access or devices to North Koreans could get people killed.

But in a purely practical sense, the US has few options. War with North Korea could start a nuclear conflict or otherwise introduce a more long-term proliferation risk.

“They're not going to denuclearise until their regime changes and society changes,” Sun said. “This approach may be the longer route, but it has the hope of succeeding.”

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...jong-un-nuclear-missile-testing-a7942756.html
 

Chelonian

Moderator
Joined
Aug 10, 2010
Posts
11,118
Reaction score
13,571
It's not a far-fetched concept and could feasibly fatally destabilise North Korea. Digital social media was arguably the fundamental communication channel which fuelled the so-called Arab Spring revolutions. Which is why Saudi Arabia fears Al Jazeera and its associated social media channels.

But I'm unsure how much thought has gone into what the world does with a collapsed North Korea. If refugees flood into China the instability could be contagious in China's border provinces. The phrase 'unintended consequences' springs to mind. Particularly as the West has a lamentable track record in looking beyond regime change.
 

stumpylegs

Valuable Contributor
Joined
May 12, 2017
Posts
278
Reaction score
180
I don't have much knowledge on North Korea. Don't they have to import anything? Or is the country self sustainable, if not just cut off what it needs which would cause the people to rise up and over throw the government?
 

Chelonian

Moderator
Joined
Aug 10, 2010
Posts
11,118
Reaction score
13,571
Or is the country self sustainable, if not just cut off what it needs which would cause the people to rise up and over throw the government?

China could certainly impose economic sanctions which would destabilise North Korea but would then almost certainly trigger a truly massive influx of refugees into Chinese provinces that may themselves become unstable. Not to mention the uncertainty in China about a new and as yet unknown regime on its borders.
 

Churchy10

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2016
Posts
112
Reaction score
68
If maximum sanctions are imposed cutting off all trade, it will only starve 99.9% of the NK population. Kim and his chums will still be living it up and will not give a hoot.

The NK people are so brainwashed I doubt that alone would cause an uprising.

The root causes Kim and his inner circle in my view, they need to be taken out in one way or another
 

Chelonian

Moderator
Joined
Aug 10, 2010
Posts
11,118
Reaction score
13,571
The root causes Kim and his inner circle in my view, they need to be taken out in one way or another

Arguably the bigger problem is not overthrowing the Kim dynasty but replacing it.
 
Top