I was just writing a post explaining this. I agree with you.No, but burning jet fuel weakens them significantly enough so that they can no longer provide support. Coupled with everything else in the building that was burning you get some enormous heat.
The illuminati control the world. Making Russia stick to the script is childs play for the all powerful shadow men .My popcorn bag has been poised since 1407 (not AD).
I do enjoy a conspiracy theory so I'll open up the field a bit:
The loons (sorry, free-thinking sceptics) who deny the Apollo moon landings.
Just how did the USA-Illuminati-NASA triad persuade 300,000-plus NASA employees, sub-contractors and the former USSR to stick to the script for almost fifty years?
My popcorn bag has been poised since 1407 (not AD).
I do enjoy a conspiracy theory so I'll open up the field a bit
There's a lot of evidence to support and refute both sides. I think people will always wonder about it.I done Civil Engineering and I'll just say that if the heat was sufficient to significantly weaken steel but not melt it. Then the building would have collapsed in stages with various chunks coming down at a time. Not in complete freefall speed along with all the evidence of all the various investigations into financial institutions. Larry Silverstein made $4.6 billion and there's countless other rich white collar businesses and individuals who made a lot of money that day.
It's fairly obvious things don't add up.
Some really interesting stuff.
Or so the theory goes.Those smugglers went on to sign the constitution of the USA as founding fathers, John Hancock etc. A country started on a conspiracy theory.